> ## Documentation Index
> Fetch the complete documentation index at: https://docs.surfais.com/llms.txt
> Use this file to discover all available pages before exploring further.

# Mentions vs citations

> The difference between being named in an answer and being its source.

Surfais tracks two related but different things every time an AI platform answers one of your prompts: whether your brand was **mentioned**, and whether your content was **cited**. They often move together, but not always — and the gap between them tells you something neither number tells you on its own.

## The two definitions

**A mention is your brand named in the answer's text.** ChatGPT, Claude, Gemini, Perplexity, or Google AI Overviews used your brand name (or a known alias) somewhere in the words of the response. A mention is what [Visibility](/metrics/visibility) and [Position](/metrics/position) measure: are you part of the conversation, and how prominently. Browse every mention on the [Mentions feed](/analysis/mentions-feed).

**A citation is a source URL the AI used or linked to.** Most AI answers list the pages they drew from, either inline or as a reference list. A citation is a URL, not a name — it tells you which domain the AI treated as a source, regardless of whose brand it belongs to. See every citation on [Citations & Source Opportunities](/analysis/citations-sources).

<Info>
  A citation to your own domain counts as your content being read. A citation to someone else's domain — a review site, a competitor's blog — still counts as a citation, just not one that credits you.
</Info>

## Why they don't always move together

**Mentioned but not cited.** The AI names your brand without linking to anything you own. This is common and not a problem by itself — it usually means the AI learned about you from training data, a review aggregator, or a competitor's comparison page that happened to mention you. You're visible, but the underlying source of that visibility isn't your own content.

**Cited but not mentioned.** Rarer, but it happens: the AI pulls a fact from a page on your domain — a spec, a pricing table, a blog post — without naming your brand in the surrounding prose. Your content did the work; the answer's language just didn't credit you by name.

**Both, together.** The strongest outcome: the AI names your brand *and* cites your own domain as the source — content clear and structured enough that AI platforms both recognise it and quote it.

## Why the distinction matters

A mention problem is a **visibility** problem — your brand isn't part of enough answers, which usually means your prompt library, your aliases, or your market coverage needs attention. A citation problem is a **content** problem — AI platforms aren't treating your own pages as a source worth pulling from, even when they're happy to mention your brand from elsewhere. That's the gap [Source Visibility](/metrics/source-visibility) measures, and [Citations & Source Opportunities](/analysis/citations-sources) helps you close.

<Tip>
  If your AIS Score looks healthy but you rarely see your own domain among the cited sources, that's not a contradiction — it means AI platforms have learned about you from elsewhere. Worth investigating, but not a sign anything is broken.
</Tip>

## Related pages

<CardGroup cols={2}>
  <Card title="Visibility" href="/metrics/visibility">
    How mention rate and platform consistency roll into your AIS Score.
  </Card>

  <Card title="The Mentions feed" href="/analysis/mentions-feed">
    Browse every mention, grouped by recency and drillable by country.
  </Card>

  <Card title="Citations & Source Opportunities" href="/analysis/citations-sources">
    See which domains AI cites, and where to earn a citation next.
  </Card>

  <Card title="The AI Readiness page" href="/readiness/readiness-page">
    Why AI platforms can or can't read and cite your content in the first place.
  </Card>
</CardGroup>
